Greg’s Blog - principal (le?) learning

link

This conference sounds very cool!

What is EduCon 2.1?
EduCon 2.1 is both a conversation and a conference.
And it is not a technology conference. It is an education conference. It is, hopefully, an innovation conference where we can come together, both in person and virtually, to discuss the future of schools. Every session will be an opportunity to discuss and debate ideas — from the very practical to the big dreams.

Guiding Principles of EduCon 2.1
1) Our schools must be inquiry-driven, thoughtful and empowering for all members
2) Our schools must be about co-creating — together with our students — the 21st Century Citizen
3) Technology must serve pedagogy, not the other way around.
4) Technology must enable students to research, create, communicate and collaborate
5) Learning can — and must — be networked.

There are going to be some great thinkers here in an TedTalk like format as well as keynotes.  It is not often I aspire to go to conferences overseas but this sounds great.  Wouldn’t this be fun in NZ … get a whole group of great thinkers and practitioners together and get them to spend 10-15min reflecting on their key professional learning.  Then time for interaction and conversation.

The ultimate UnConference ….??!!

I love the Guiding Principals …. capture well what the revised NZC has to offer in terms of possibilities and where I believe ICTs fit in our classrooms.  Isn’t it good to see the #3 made overt …. “oh my teaching will be so much beter if only I had an IWB, another 3 laptops, more digital cameras”.  Rubbish!!  Your teaching will be better whe you are a better teacher, not simply when you have more toys and tools.

I have been thinking more and more about performance management and appraisal since the last time I wrote on this….

I really like the diagram below from Julia Atkin!

Many people find ICT (and other) learning stays stuck very much in the Guru Loop stage where they are doing things simply because someone else says it is a good idea, and they rely on others for stimulation and resources.  The fun bit starts when you are reflecting on practice and aligning things from different places in your professional learning network to create new things to do to make things even better for yourself and the children you teach.

I have shared this with our staff to encourage them to move beyond relying on me or any other person to tell them what to do.  Also to make the point that it IS ok to take the leap from following the tried and true to what you now know will make a positive difference for the children in your class.

The thing this diagram also highlights well is the stress and ‘ouch’/discomfort factor of moving from being told what to do to working it out for yourself…. but thats when it is really fun and exciting learning just begins!

blatently cut and pasted from Cult of Mac Blog:

Mac OS X is, and always has been, vulnerable to trojans.

The whole point of trojans is that they exploit the most serious security problem of all: gullible users. A trojan does not take advantage of any holes in the code, all it needs is to persuade someone to click an “OK”, or to run an installer, and it has done its job.

The problem with a lot of the reporting of malware, especially by traditional media, is that the word “virus” is widely used to mean “malware”.

Most of us who are half-way to computer literate know the difference between a trojan and a virus, but most of the rest of the world has no idea.

That’s why we’re seeing news articles about “Mac viruses”, and we shall continue to see them in future. That’s also why your Windows-using friends are going to be smirking at you, saying: “Heh. And you said you didn’t get viruses on your Mac. Bet you feel stupid now, huh?”

Any computer is vulnerable to trojans. The security hole they exploit is not in the operating system, it’s the one sitting in the chair and tapping on the keyboard.

Wanna keep your computer clean? Next time you’re surfing some random porn site and a pop-up tells you to “Install a codec” so you can watch the movies, it’s a good idea to click Cancel.

I must be computer illiterate as this clarified the difference for me! …. lol

I love this image from Tony Ryans blog. He also shared it in his ULearn presentations …. it has so much to say at so many levels!

it reminds me of our school vision which is also visual rather than lots of words.

(note - link is to our new school website I am working on so is very much a work in progress.  If you go to here you will get to our public site.)

An article worth reading from Charles Handy:

Unexamined learning can turn out to be wasted learning, while those who fail to learn from their mistakes are doomed to repeat them. Which is why wise organizations build in regular review sessions for their work groups, to help them spell out the lessons, good and bad, that they have learned from their recent experiences. The most fruitful appraisals, too, are those that focus on what has been learned during the year, rather than on grading performance. Leaders, in particular, I now believe, need to devote time and intellectual energy to reflecting on their experiences in order to crystallize what they have learned and can now add to their stack of knowledge.

I have been having interesting conversations recently with a number of people at school, in our cluster and online about appraisal and performance management. I see the two as VERY different!

Performance Management = people making changes to their practice and reflecting on what they have done so they have lessons they can imbed in their practice/s. Making practice better.

Appraisal = summative judgements about how good that practice actually is.

We all (should) learn from our practice in an ongoing way.  Few teachers simply bang their head against the brick wall of poor practice.  I don’t know any teachers, parents, principals who get out of bed each day thinking “whose life can I ruin today?”  We all do our best …

But do we learn from what we do?  The answer to that is very different for different teachers!  Some reflect deeply on their practice and endeavour to improve it step-by-step.  Others simply treat teaching as a technocratic activity where if they do the ‘right’ things kids will learn through some mystical and mysterious processes.  I want the deeply reflective ones in our school thanks.

The challenge for appraisal and pefomance management processes is capturing the learning.  What is different inside the teachers head and for their practice as a result of the professional learning that has taken place this year?  This is Teaching as Inquiry as described in the NZC …. ongoing action research about pedagogy for real.  We have developed a framework for this that is one page for any given objective/focus.

It is a cool time of the year for me having the discussions with each teacher about the things they have LEARNED.  A time to celebrate the successes and offer new challenges.  Acknowledge the challenges overcome and the learning steps taken.  What has been left behind, what has been reinforced, what has been adopted.

What professional learning is all about.

Doug Johnson is great.  I love his sense of humour and this list of t-shirt slogans is fabulous.

Some of my favourites:

“to err is human, to arr is pirate”

“For every action, there is an equal and opposite government program.”

“Books – the original laptop.”

“They say I have A.D.D. but they just don’t understand. Oh Look! A chicken!”

“Mirror, mirror on the wall… What the **^&%^&% happened?”

“Education bridges the gap between your ears.”

“With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.”

“If swimming is so good for your figure, how do you explain whales?”

I used to keep a list like this in the back of my planbook of funny sayings, supposed report comments and things.  Just for the end of ‘those’ days.  We all need to laugh a lot more!

Life is NOT a dress rehearsal, lets make it fun while it lasts.

Have a good weekend!!

(oh and add any more gems in the comments!!)

We had our Cluster sharing of the Action Research projects the Lead Teachers have been doing over the past year on Thursday.  What an incredible group!  I was just blown away by the calibre of the thinking and the reflection the teachers had engaged in.

Most of the presentations would have easily been a ULearn workshop.  Some were of a higher level than presentations I went to this year.

It is really interesting having seen the work that Cluster techers have been involved in across the country now how different the things people focus on are.  We have come a LONG way in the 10months of our Cluster.  We have seen huge growth in the personal confidence and competence of the LT group as well as the teachers in our school(s).

One interesting discussion that came out of the day for me was one about the difference between confidence and competence.  One of the teachers had done some work looking at the core computer skills her children needed to have and was surprised about the things the children didn’t know that she assumed they did.  ‘Simple’ stuff like finding your way around menus, what toolbar buttons do, basic file management and problem solving.  This led to thinking about what things children can do and how small (often) their view of the potential and functionality of technologies is.  An example would be cell phones - most teenagers and even some quite young children are confident users of this technology.  But their use is often focused on a small part of the potentional functionality.  Children can confident users of software but often only in the things they already know, not pushing the boundaries or potential.

As adults we are sometimes the same.  Confidence and competence are a bit of a chicken and egg arguement in some ways - you have to have ability to be confident; but conversely confidence leads to experimentation and hece competence.  We all know of the adults and children who are supremely confident but for whom we know the competence aspect is not where they think it is.

We all need the space, time and support to develop both in the things we are focusing on in our professional learning.

well I thought it was funny ….

source