<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technology v&#8217;s quality programmes?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.core-ed.net/greg/2008/07/technology_vs_quality_programm.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.core-ed.net/greg/2008/07/technology_vs_quality_programm.html</link>
	<description>My journey in the evolving world of ICT's, Learning and Teaching...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bradley</title>
		<link>http://blog.core-ed.net/greg/2008/07/technology_vs_quality_programm.html#comment-572</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.core-ed.net/greg/2008/07/technology-vs-quality-programmes.html#comment-572</guid>
		<description>Hi Greg
Interesting point about good movies from classrooms with poor literacy numeracy programs. My experience is that teachers with poor programs are usually "too busy" to getting around to making a meaningful movie!
Cheers and I read and enjoy your blog
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Greg<br />
Interesting point about good movies from classrooms with poor literacy numeracy programs. My experience is that teachers with poor programs are usually &#8220;too busy&#8221; to getting around to making a meaningful movie!<br />
Cheers and I read and enjoy your blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
